Debatte aims to share knowledge – generously and critically, resisting the authoritarian drift with nuance. It draws on ideas and discussions from the Alliance for Critical Scholarship in Solidarity (KriSol). It offers three genres: Picks are short, introductory texts or commentaries on articles by other authors and published elsewhere, which we consider important and want to share with a wider public. Drops recommend publications by KriSol members. Posts are longer contributions that we write ourselves or ask others to write – reflections, reports, reviews, letters, short reports, comments, interviews …
-
Neo-liberal release of fascism?
To what extent do the theories of fascism available to us help us to understand today’s phenomena of fascization? As early as 2020, Zeynep Gambetti’s theoretical explorations of the origins of contemporary fascist tendencies were published. But perhaps the focus on the dynamics of neoliberalism misses something. By Julia Eckert.
-
The German silence about the protests in Serbia
Snežana Stanković picks an article in the Guardian about the student protests in Serbia, which challenge not only the corrupt Serbian government but also the interests of Western and German states with their non-violent resistance.
-
A smokescreen for an authoritarian turn?
In the daily Neues Deutschland, Marion Detjen recommends a close reading of the Bundestag resolution on “Anti-Semitism and hostility towards Israel at schools and universities”; only then do the contradictions and the to be expected negative effects become apparent.
-
Universities are not “hotbeds” of antisemitism
In this guest article in Spiegel, Ilyas Saliba questions the premise of the Bundestag that another resolution dictating to universities how they should work is helpful in the fight against antisemitism.
-
Reason of state OR constitutional state
Andreas Engelmann writes in a guest article on etos.media about the “astonishing comeback” of the German “reason of state” (Staatsräson), a pre-democratic concept that places the interests of the state above the law, disregards the law and the constitution, and does not want mature citizens but loyal followers.
-
Palestine protests at universities: the police is not needed!
A guest commentary by Ilyas Saliba and Ralf Michaels in the taz on the decision of the president of the Alice Salomon University of Applied Sciences in Berlin to keep the police out.
-
Antisemitism resolutions lead to the erosion of constitutional standards
Florian Meinel writes on the Verfassungsblog about the legal tool of the Parliamentary resolution and the already visible consequences in administrative practice.
-
“Just say genocide” – the politics of invitation/disinvitation as a game of institutional self-assurance
The psychoanalyst Avgi Saketopoulou was first invited and then disinvited by the Sigmund Freud Museum in Vienna. For The Battleground, she analyzes this as a symptom of unresolved institutional contradictions.
-
The antisemitism resolutions identify Jews with Israel and are therefore antisemitic themselves
In Freitag, the Jewish-American intellectual historian Samantha Carmel accuses the German parliament of eradicating the voices of left-wing Jews who do not feel represented by Israel, and sees in this a continuity with National Socialism.
Selected and offered by KriSol – A Space for Debate
The Editorial Collective currently consists of Marion Detjen, Julia Eckert, Isabel Feichtner und Christian Strippel.